In this study; It is aimed to investigate whether the linguistic phenomenon is included in the concept of value in field studies related to value education. The problem of researching in this framework is, "What is the value of being included in a subtitle as the value of the concept of" language "in the texts obtained about education of values?. In order to achieve this aim, the articles obtained as a result of searching the key concepts of "language + value + value education" on the internet were scanned in Journal of Values Education, graduate theses and doctoral dissertations from periodicals. In the research, document review technique was used from the qualitative research techniques and the obtained documents were analyzed by descriptive analysis. As a result of this review, it has been determined that classifications of Spranger, Rokeach, Schwartz and Nelson are used in the researches on values and values education in Turkey. These values are thought to have arisen as a result of human being being centered as an individual in life. However, if the existence of a human being is meaningful, it is not found in the titles of values. The end result of human being's worthy act of speech. The individual who uses language skills starts to create values that will please him. If these values are thought to be independent from the background, it should be seen as a problem. This problem is seen in primary education programs, Turkish textbooks and secondary literature books. As a result, it is foreseen that in this study it is open to debate the idea of adding the usual value classifications to the "linguistic case", that language is a value on its own and that other values that explain this value are better understood.

Language, language ability, value.